Web19 de ago. de 2011 · The accused 1 & 2 were also convicted under Section 3(4) of POTA. Accused No.4 namely Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru was acquitted of all the charges … Web#Parliament_Attack #CaseStudy #IndianLAWState (N.C.T. of Delhi) V/s Navjot Sandhu Parliament Attack Case Law की कहानी By Tansukh Sir13 दिसंबर 2001 को ...

Admissibility of the evidence concerning discovery of fact due …

WebPurnima Mathur (Impact of social media in the Law of Evidence), she talks about the admissibility of e-evidence in the courts of India, evidentiary value of social media posts in Indian courts and some international cases where social media posts are used as evidence in courts outside India. · WebOf Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu@ Afsan Guru on 4 August, 2005 Change context size Current 1. The genesis of this case lies in a macabre incident that took place close to the noon time on 13th December, 2001 in which five heavily armed persons practically stormed the Parliament House complex and inflicted heavy casualties on the security men on duty. monica\u0027s son rodney ramone hill iii

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) V/s Navjot Sandhu Parliament Attack Case ...

Web18 de ene. de 2005 · Navjot Sandhu State...NCT of Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu, 2005...pertaining to electronic record, as stated by this Court in Navjot Sandhu case, does not lay down the correct legal position. It requires to be overruled and we do so. An electronic record by way of... State Through Special Cell, New Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu … Web24 de feb. de 2005 · State (Nct Of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu Alias Afsan Guru . Order 1. Mr Gopal Subramanium, learned Senior Counsel resumed his arguments at 10.45 a.m Crl. MPs. Nos. 2030-32 of 2005 in Crl. As. Nos. 376-78 of 2004 2. Web26 de jun. de 2024 · NAVJOT SANDHU - E-Justice India. June 26, 2024. Home Students Corner Case Summary Case Summary : STATE (NCT OF DELHI) VS. NAVJOT … monica\u0027s scandinavian gift shop